<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making multiple form output look better</title>
	<link>http://www.php-scripts.com/20051114/63/</link>
	<description>Writing about PHP scripting since 12/99. Learn something new every day.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.php-scripts.com/20051114/63/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>TDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.php-scripts.com/20051114/63/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>That's a good alternative suggestion, Kenoli.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good alternative suggestion, Kenoli.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenoli Oleari</title>
		<link>http://www.php-scripts.com/20051114/63/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenoli Oleari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.php-scripts.com/20051114/63/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Why not carry CSS one step further and position the form rather than recommending that the reader resort to tables for positioning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not carry CSS one step further and position the form rather than recommending that the reader resort to tables for positioning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; YPN now has RSS ads</title>
		<link>http://www.php-scripts.com/20051114/63/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; YPN now has RSS ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.php-scripts.com/20051114/63/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] Does this disrupt the RSS reading experience? One of my biggest concerns with using ads in RSS was that the reading experience would be too disrupted. I respect publisher&#8217;s wanting to be paid for their content, but I do not like being abused by advertisements trying to read the content; it&#8217;s a very delicate balance. I think this might have something to do with why some people trying other RSS ads were experiencing poor clickthru ratios because they overdid the experience. Being a firm believer in ads in moderation, I wanted to see what this experience would be like &#8212; as a reader &#8212; in several different RSS readers. So I fired up several different RSS readers to check out this feed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Does this disrupt the RSS reading experience? One of my biggest concerns with using ads in RSS was that the reading experience would be too disrupted. I respect publisher&#8217;s wanting to be paid for their content, but I do not like being abused by advertisements trying to read the content; it&#8217;s a very delicate balance. I think this might have something to do with why some people trying other RSS ads were experiencing poor clickthru ratios because they overdid the experience. Being a firm believer in ads in moderation, I wanted to see what this experience would be like &#8212; as a reader &#8212; in several different RSS readers. So I fired up several different RSS readers to check out this feed [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
